Trending...
- Colorado: Washington Post Editorial Board on Gov. Polis' Let's Get Ready Initiative: How to track educational performance? Here's a good start
- AI Transforming the POD Industry: Innovations and Opportunities
- Anern Shines at SOLAR AFRICA 2025 with Integrated Solar + Storage Solutions
CCHR says electroshocking minors—including 5-year-olds—causes brain damage and violates global human rights standards, urging U.S. states to prohibit the practice under child abuse laws.
LOS ANGELES - ColoradoDesk -- Child and adolescent psychiatrists have issued a policy statement urging broader access to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for children and adolescents despite growing international condemnation of the practice on minors. Both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Human Rights Office have called for an outright ban on ECT for children, explicitly stating: "ECT is not recommended for children, and this should be prohibited through legislation."[1] The Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR), a mental health industry watchdog, condemned the statement as "medically reckless, legally dangerous, and morally indefensible." CCHR is demanding federal and state lawmakers move urgently to outlaw the electroshocking of children, classifying it as a form of child abuse.
ECT, also known as shock treatment, sends up to 460 volts of electricity through the brain to induce a grand mal seizure. This disruption of the brain's electrical activity alters its structure and function—an especially serious risk to the developing brains of children. Yet child psychiatrists not only call for expanded use of ECT on minors but also oppose "any efforts—legal, legislative, and otherwise—to block access to ECT."
Through US Freedom of Information Act requests CCHR uncovered that children as young as five have been electroshocked. The full scope remains hidden due to the lack of national transparency requirements on ECT usage.
Internationally, some countries have already banned ECT entirely (e.g., Slovenia and Luxembourg). In the U.S., California prohibits it under age 12, and Texas under 16. In Western Australia, ECT on minors under 14 is illegal, with criminal penalties—including jail time—for administering it to children. CCHR was instrumental in helping secure that law, along with state bans in the US.
More on Colorado Desk
Disturbingly, a child and adolescent psychiatry group has also called for more research involving ECT on youth, potentially exposing children under age 13 to an unproven and highly invasive procedure. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) restricts its use to individuals aged 13 and older for limited diagnoses.
The psychiatry group's statement fails to disclose that brain damage is a known risk of ECT. Yet, the American Psychiatric Association concedes that "ECT can result in persistent or permanent memory loss." The joint WHO/UN report adds: "People being offered ECT should also be made aware of all its risks and potential short- and long-term harmful effects, such as memory loss and brain damage."[2]
In June 2024, the California Supreme Court ruled that an ECT device manufacturer must warn doctors of the risks of brain damage and permanent memory loss.[3] In 2018, a US District Court judge found there was sufficient evidence for a jury to conclude that an ECT device could cause brain injury.[4]
Neuropathologist Dr. Bennet Omalu—known for discovering chronic traumatic encephalopathy (brain diseases or damage) in football players—publicly condemned ECT, stating: "The amounts of electrical energy introduced to the human brain by ECT machines can be nothing but harmful and dangerous… The patient who receives ECT therapy will manifest permanent and cumulative brain injury, which can be progressive over time and result in chronic encephalopathies and brain degeneration."[5]
Despite pediatric psychiatry's claim that ECT is "safe and effective," the FDA has never required manufacturers to prove ECT's safety or efficacy through clinical trials.[6] Internationally renowned researcher Prof. John Read reports that only 11 placebo-controlled trials of ECT have ever been conducted—all prior to 1985, and all deeply flawed. "None found any benefit beyond the end of treatment," he stated. Further, children's developing brains are "particularly susceptible to the memory loss caused by ECT."[7]
Legal precedent exists for holding professionals and psychiatric facilities accountable for misleading parents about the safety and nature of treatment. In June 2024, an Arizona jury awarded $2.5 million in punitive damages to the family of a teen girl who suffered coercion and abuse at a troubled teen treatment facility. They successfully argued that they were misled by marketing materials portraying the program as therapeutic and safe, when it was abusive.[8]
More on Colorado Desk
CCHR says that this same legal framework must apply to misleading promotion of ECT's benefits to desperate parents. Failing to disclose the full risks of ECT should be subject to the same scrutiny and liability as cases in the troubled teen treatment industry.
CCHR asserts that electroshock should not only be banned nationwide, but if administered to children, should be held accountable under child abuse laws.
Jan Eastgate, president of CCHR International, stated, "The electroshocking of children is without moral or scientific justification and should be indefensible under the law. As international bodies condemn it, and legal rulings establish precedent for holding programs accountable for misleading parents, the U.S. must act. We urge lawmakers at all levels to ban ECT, especially on minors, and define it as a form of child abuse."
CCHR, which was established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and professor of psychiatry, Dr. Thomas Szasz, recommends parents watch its documentary, Therapy or Torture: The Truth About Electroshock, with expert opinions about how ECT damages minds.
Sources:
[1] World Health Organization, OHCHR, "Guidance on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation," pp. 58 & 59
[2] www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psychiatry-through-the-looking-glass/202311/is-it-time-to-ban-electroconvulsive-therapy-for
[3] www.wisnerbaum.com/blog/2024/june/wisner-baum-prevails-in-landmark-win-for-patient/
[4] "ECT Litigation Update: Are Patients Being Warned of Brain Damage Risk?" MAD, 13 June 2019
[5] www.wisnerbaum.com/defective-medical-device-injuries/ect/
[6] www.wisnerbaum.com/defective-medical-device-injuries/ect/; https://www.cnet.com/health/fda-approved-vs-fda-cleared-whats-the-difference/
[7] www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psychiatry-through-the-looking-glass/202311/is-it-time-to-ban-electroconvulsive-therapy-for
[8] www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/column-troubled-teen-industry-scrutiny-builds-litigation-follows-2024-07-12/; www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-education/2024/07/19/spring-ridge-academy-students-arizona-describe-harsh-treatment-after-lawsuit/74461275007/
ECT, also known as shock treatment, sends up to 460 volts of electricity through the brain to induce a grand mal seizure. This disruption of the brain's electrical activity alters its structure and function—an especially serious risk to the developing brains of children. Yet child psychiatrists not only call for expanded use of ECT on minors but also oppose "any efforts—legal, legislative, and otherwise—to block access to ECT."
Through US Freedom of Information Act requests CCHR uncovered that children as young as five have been electroshocked. The full scope remains hidden due to the lack of national transparency requirements on ECT usage.
Internationally, some countries have already banned ECT entirely (e.g., Slovenia and Luxembourg). In the U.S., California prohibits it under age 12, and Texas under 16. In Western Australia, ECT on minors under 14 is illegal, with criminal penalties—including jail time—for administering it to children. CCHR was instrumental in helping secure that law, along with state bans in the US.
More on Colorado Desk
- Faex Health Begins Research Toward AI-Powered Colorectal Cancer Detection Through Stool Imaging
- Success for Global Communications Leader IQSTEL, Inc. Growing From $13 Million Revenue in 2018 to Nearly $300 Million Last Year
- Artbound: "The Cheech" Awarded Two 2025 LA Area EMMY Awards — Honored in ARTS & MUSIC COMPOSITION
- Colorado Springs: Deceased Individuals Identified from Fatal Crash at Powers Boulevard and Fountain Boulevard
- City Council Invites Community Engagement: Volunteer for Colorado Springs Boards, Commissions, and Committees
Disturbingly, a child and adolescent psychiatry group has also called for more research involving ECT on youth, potentially exposing children under age 13 to an unproven and highly invasive procedure. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) restricts its use to individuals aged 13 and older for limited diagnoses.
The psychiatry group's statement fails to disclose that brain damage is a known risk of ECT. Yet, the American Psychiatric Association concedes that "ECT can result in persistent or permanent memory loss." The joint WHO/UN report adds: "People being offered ECT should also be made aware of all its risks and potential short- and long-term harmful effects, such as memory loss and brain damage."[2]
In June 2024, the California Supreme Court ruled that an ECT device manufacturer must warn doctors of the risks of brain damage and permanent memory loss.[3] In 2018, a US District Court judge found there was sufficient evidence for a jury to conclude that an ECT device could cause brain injury.[4]
Neuropathologist Dr. Bennet Omalu—known for discovering chronic traumatic encephalopathy (brain diseases or damage) in football players—publicly condemned ECT, stating: "The amounts of electrical energy introduced to the human brain by ECT machines can be nothing but harmful and dangerous… The patient who receives ECT therapy will manifest permanent and cumulative brain injury, which can be progressive over time and result in chronic encephalopathies and brain degeneration."[5]
Despite pediatric psychiatry's claim that ECT is "safe and effective," the FDA has never required manufacturers to prove ECT's safety or efficacy through clinical trials.[6] Internationally renowned researcher Prof. John Read reports that only 11 placebo-controlled trials of ECT have ever been conducted—all prior to 1985, and all deeply flawed. "None found any benefit beyond the end of treatment," he stated. Further, children's developing brains are "particularly susceptible to the memory loss caused by ECT."[7]
Legal precedent exists for holding professionals and psychiatric facilities accountable for misleading parents about the safety and nature of treatment. In June 2024, an Arizona jury awarded $2.5 million in punitive damages to the family of a teen girl who suffered coercion and abuse at a troubled teen treatment facility. They successfully argued that they were misled by marketing materials portraying the program as therapeutic and safe, when it was abusive.[8]
More on Colorado Desk
- Colorado Springs: Victims Identified from Fatal Crash at South Circle Drive and Hancock Expressway
- Colorado Springs: Alex Kovacs named Aviation Director for COS
- Colorado Springs: Mayor Yemi's statement on 2025 Point-In-Time (PIT) Count
- Rising Conservative Star Jordan Brace Emerges as Influential Political Voice with Elite Washington Connections
- Conservative Latinos for PA Shaping the Future of Hispanic Community, Guest State Treasurer Stacy Garrity
CCHR says that this same legal framework must apply to misleading promotion of ECT's benefits to desperate parents. Failing to disclose the full risks of ECT should be subject to the same scrutiny and liability as cases in the troubled teen treatment industry.
CCHR asserts that electroshock should not only be banned nationwide, but if administered to children, should be held accountable under child abuse laws.
Jan Eastgate, president of CCHR International, stated, "The electroshocking of children is without moral or scientific justification and should be indefensible under the law. As international bodies condemn it, and legal rulings establish precedent for holding programs accountable for misleading parents, the U.S. must act. We urge lawmakers at all levels to ban ECT, especially on minors, and define it as a form of child abuse."
CCHR, which was established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and professor of psychiatry, Dr. Thomas Szasz, recommends parents watch its documentary, Therapy or Torture: The Truth About Electroshock, with expert opinions about how ECT damages minds.
Sources:
[1] World Health Organization, OHCHR, "Guidance on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation," pp. 58 & 59
[2] www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psychiatry-through-the-looking-glass/202311/is-it-time-to-ban-electroconvulsive-therapy-for
[3] www.wisnerbaum.com/blog/2024/june/wisner-baum-prevails-in-landmark-win-for-patient/
[4] "ECT Litigation Update: Are Patients Being Warned of Brain Damage Risk?" MAD, 13 June 2019
[5] www.wisnerbaum.com/defective-medical-device-injuries/ect/
[6] www.wisnerbaum.com/defective-medical-device-injuries/ect/; https://www.cnet.com/health/fda-approved-vs-fda-cleared-whats-the-difference/
[7] www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psychiatry-through-the-looking-glass/202311/is-it-time-to-ban-electroconvulsive-therapy-for
[8] www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/column-troubled-teen-industry-scrutiny-builds-litigation-follows-2024-07-12/; www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-education/2024/07/19/spring-ridge-academy-students-arizona-describe-harsh-treatment-after-lawsuit/74461275007/
Source: Citizens Commission on Human Rights International
0 Comments
Latest on Colorado Desk
- Qualis LLC Appoints Jeremy Mallicoat as Chief Financial Officer to Advance Growth and Acquisition Strategy
- Bynn Intelligence Reinvents Document Fraud Detection with Groundbreaking Acquisition and Revolutionary AI Model
- 2A Commerce Launches Firearms eCommerce Platform
- Health-E Commerce® to Showcase flexible spending account (FSA) and health savings account (HSA) Engagement Tools at 38th Annual ECFC Symposium
- New Book "Outsmarting the Robot" Reveals the Most Secure Careers in the Age of AI Disruption
- Exposing Psychiatric Abuse, CCHR Has Pushed for Global Human Rights Protections
- RDG Mining launches 1-day XRP、BTC mining contract, XRP short-term investment users surge 500%
- Donna Cardellino and Paul Lafrance Sign Exclusive Deal for Worldwide Expansion into Commercial and Luxury Real Estate Design Projects
- New Book "Three Permissions" Redefines Self-Leadership for a Burnout-Weary Culture
- Opening a new era of USDC smart cloud mining: CJB Crypto makes digital dollar earnings within reach
- The Evolution of the BDCV Platform: Empowering Mental Health & Wellness
- Philadelphia HVAC Company Bypasses Paid Search Ads, Citing Cost Savings for Customers
- Block AI Labs Empowers Startups with Affordable, AI-Driven Software Development from U.S. and Colombia Ask ChatGPT
- Colorado: Governor Polis Appoints Kimberlee R. Keleher to the Phillips County Court
- BigBossBooling Releases 'Big Boss,' A Raw Anthem of Personal Reclamation
- Colorado, Other States Succeed In Getting Trump Administration to Unlock All Remaining Withheld Education Funding
- Denver Landscape Construction: Phase One Landscapes Enhances Site Page for Custom Outdoor Living
- Kanga Care Acquires GroVia, Uniting Two Trailblazers in Cloth Diapering Innovation
- Celebrate Colorado! Governor Polis Invites Coloradans to Celebrate 149th Annual Colorado Day
- June 2025: Colorado Springs Airport Monthly Traffic Release