Trending...
- Rep. Gina H. Curry and Dr. Conan Tu Inspire at Kopp Foundation for Diabetes Hybrid Fundraising Gala and National Leadership Forum
- WADA AWARDS - where Diamonds melt into glamour
- ASI Honors Client Achievements at 27th Annual iNNOVATIONS Conference
DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Discount cigarette manufacturers Liggett Group LLC, Vector Tobacco Inc. and deep discount cigarette manufacturer Xcaliber International Ltd., together with a Colorado citizen and cigarette smoker, today announced that they have filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against the State of Colorado in United States Federal Court. The motion seeks to enjoin Colorado from enforcing the recently enacted Colorado minimum cigarette price requirement, which would drastically raise retail cigarette prices for Colorado consumers to premium brand levels.
The motion alleges that the requirement was inserted into a cigarette tax increase bill solely to secure support for the bill from Philip Morris, the largest U.S. seller of premium cigarettes such as Marlboro, which, in the past, had spent millions of dollars successfully opposing previous tax increases. Along with Colorado cigarette retailers, Philip Morris will reap huge benefits from the new legislation because the minimum price requirement will eliminate price competition from companies that sell discount and deep discount cigarettes and destroy their ability to compete in Colorado.
More on Colorado Desk
The motion also alleges that the minimum price requirement violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution by favoring Colorado retailers' in-state economic interests over the interests of out-of-state discount manufacturers. Further, in violation of the Colorado Constitution, the minimum price requirement was not properly disclosed to Colorado voters who approved the bill on Election Day. Voters believed that the tax increases would benefit education and other public purposes, when in fact all of the benefit of the minimum price provision will go to retailers, Philip Morris and other premium cigarette manufacturers, and none to the State of Colorado.
The motion can be seen by clicking here.
The plaintiffs are represented by Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP and the Denver firm, Maven Law Group.
The motion alleges that the requirement was inserted into a cigarette tax increase bill solely to secure support for the bill from Philip Morris, the largest U.S. seller of premium cigarettes such as Marlboro, which, in the past, had spent millions of dollars successfully opposing previous tax increases. Along with Colorado cigarette retailers, Philip Morris will reap huge benefits from the new legislation because the minimum price requirement will eliminate price competition from companies that sell discount and deep discount cigarettes and destroy their ability to compete in Colorado.
More on Colorado Desk
- $73.6M Pipeline, $10M Crypto Play & Legal Firepower: Why Investors Are Watching Cycurion (N A S D A Q: CYCU) Like a Hawk
- Grammy award winning Cuban-Canadian artist Alex Cuba releases its 11th studio album, "Indole"
- Thread Advisory Group Launches to Help Retailers Turn Strategy Into Lasting Results
- QView Medical and Eve Wellness Announce Partnership to Advance Direct-to-Consumer Breast Cancer Screening With FDA-Approved AI
- New Article Reveals Common Pricing Pitfalls in Flooring Projects — And How to Avoid Them
The motion also alleges that the minimum price requirement violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution by favoring Colorado retailers' in-state economic interests over the interests of out-of-state discount manufacturers. Further, in violation of the Colorado Constitution, the minimum price requirement was not properly disclosed to Colorado voters who approved the bill on Election Day. Voters believed that the tax increases would benefit education and other public purposes, when in fact all of the benefit of the minimum price provision will go to retailers, Philip Morris and other premium cigarette manufacturers, and none to the State of Colorado.
The motion can be seen by clicking here.
The plaintiffs are represented by Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP and the Denver firm, Maven Law Group.
Filed Under: Business
0 Comments
Latest on Colorado Desk
- Colorado: State is Contacting Thousands of Coloradans Who May Be Eligible For Unclaimed Tax Credits, Helping Coloradans Maximize Tax Refunds
- Deep Tissue Massage Denver | Expert Therapeutic & Sports Massage
- AI SEO Expert Chris Raulf to Present on Agentic AI and Micro SEO at DigiMarCon Denver 2025
- Chic and Secure: The Blue Luna Debuts Stylish Keychains with Purpose
- BEC Technologies Showcases Leadership in Private Broadband Ecosystem with Inclusion in UTC's Ecosystem Summary Report
- $500,000 in Stock Dividend for Shareholders in 2025 Sweetens The Pot on Success of Becoming Debt Free with No Convertible Notes or Warrants for $IQST
- Milwaukee Job Corps Center: Essential Workforce Training—Admissions Now Open
- Aissist.io Launches Hybrid AI Workforce to Solve AI Pilot Failure for Customer Support Automation
- Stream Launches AI Vision Agents
- Christy Sports Makes Snowsports More Accessible for Families to Get Outside Together
- MainConcept Completes Management Buyout to Become Independent Company
- LIB Industry Expands Full-Series Salt Spray Corrosion Test Chambers to Meet Global Testing Standards
- The Easy Way to Collect Every Wedding Photo from Your Guests - No App Needed
- Zyplr Launches in Colorado, Ending High Real Estate Commissions
- REPRESENTATION REVOLUTION: FLM TV Network Launches as America's First Truly Diverse Broadcast Network
- Same Great Mulled Wine, Fresh New Look: Evergood Wines Unveils Updated Heart Warmer Label for 2025
- Colorado: Lt. Governor Primavera Speaks at Greeley Chapter Symposium of the Federation of the Blind
- MetroWest wellness: Holliston farmhouse spa unveils Centerpoint Studio
- Colorado Filmmakers' Short Doc GRINTA! Selected for Prestigious BANFF Mountain Film Festiva
- Cancer Survivor Roslyn Franken Marks 30-Year Milestone with Empowering Gift for Women Survivors